Which Llama version should you run?
| Version | Good for | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 8B | Getting started, broad compatibility | The most widely supported version across every local AI tool |
| Llama 3.3 70B | Best quality if you have the memory | Meaningful step up in capability; needs a Mac Studio-class machine or a high-VRAM GPU setup at Q4 |
| Llama 4 Scout | Large context, mixture-of-experts | 109B total parameters (MoE, ~17B active per token); the full parameter set still needs to load into memory regardless of how few activate per token |
For most people starting out, 3.1 8B is still the right first choice. Check any of these against your exact hardware in the hardware calculator before downloading the bigger versions.
The commands
ollama run llama3.3:70b
Same pattern as any other model: Ollama downloads it the first time, then starts instantly on every run after that.
Llama-specific troubleshooting
- 3.3 70B won't load or is extremely slow: this almost always means it doesn't actually fit your available memory. Run the exact number through the calculator rather than assuming "70B should be fine."
- Llama 4 Scout uses more memory than you expected for its "active parameter" count: this is expected. Mixture-of-experts models like Scout still need their full parameter set loaded, not just the active fraction. Size your hardware to the total, not the active count.
- Responses feel repetitive or oddly formatted: try a different quantization level before assuming the model itself is the problem; very aggressive quantization (well below Q4) can produce this kind of degradation.